The
electronic cigarette is an electronic device that delivers nicotine to steam,
and it allows the individual to take in nicotine without experiencing some of
the negative effects of smoking. This is especially considering that the steam produced
does not contain tar or carbon monoxide. Studies have shown that
electronic cigarettes can help smokers stop smoking, so they can be tried
instead of other remedies that are often recommended by practitioners (Adriaens et al., 2014). As with other
approaches, they are most effective when using support smoking services such as
the NHS Smoking Support Service, among others. Currently there are no
available electronic cigarettes by prescription, but it is likely that as soon
as the medicinal products with electronic cigarettes become available, general
practitioners, who wish their patients to stop smoking, will be able to
prescribe them. The report examines several scientific studies that
analyze the harm and benefits of electronic cigarettes, and argues that devices
that evaporate liquid nicotine can successfully help smokers end their
dependence on nicotine. Although the report acknowledges that electronic
cigarettes are probably more harmful when compared to other nicotine
replacement treatments because they are not manufactured under the same safety
standards, it is likely to be the best method because it has a less harmful
effect than smoking conventional tobacco cigarettes (Malas et al., 2016). Therefore, the utilization of e-cigarettes may
be instrumental within the accomplishment of smoking cessation as a result of
its being solely less harmful than typical tobacco cigarettes; it conjointly
ensures that there's the advancement of suggests that through that people
square measure ready to cut back their dependence on nicotine.
The
increasing use of electronic cigarettes as a substitute for tobacco smoking has
been the topic of abundant dialogue, with a lot of speculation regarding their
potential risks and profit. A study that was conducted on the matter
stated that to meet almost all the problems associated with these products, it
is essential to increase studies concerning their long term effects (Brown et al., 2014). It concludes that with cheap regulation,
electronic cigarettes will build a big contribution to the interference of
premature death, sickness and social inequity in health, that smoking is
presently one amongst the most important causes. It additional suggests that
smokers within the United Kingdom ought to be confident that these product will
facilitate them quit all tobacco use for good. this is often in distinction to
the U.S., wherever the Centers for Disease Control and interference focus in
the main on the potential dangers of electronic cigarettes, particularly with
relation to smoking among adolescents (Camenga et al., 2014). These harmful effects
that are focused on come about because since electronic cigarettes are still
not regulated in the US, they come in a diversity of flavors such as chocolate
and cherries, which are liked by teenagers. The use of these flavors is
often banned in normal tobacco cigarettes, which ensures that the safety of
individuals is catered for. One of the most significant developments that have
taken place in recent years is that electronic cigarettes have ended up
overtaking conventional cigarettes in middle and high schools in the US, and
this has been cause for concern. In the study, the researchers suggest
that in the United Kingdom there is no proof that electronic cigarettes
encourage the smoking tobacco. They
further suggest that these products are instead a better means of ensuring that
there is a reduction in the use of conventional cigarettes. Moreover, the study
focuses more on how electronic cigarettes can be used to effectively remove
smokers from conventional cigarettes containing tar and other chemicals that
cause cancer.
Electronic
cigarettes are relatively new to the market, and it is obvious that much
remains to be learned about the personal and broad impact of these products on the
health of individuals. However, there is no doubt that electronic cigarettes
are very popular, and they give rise to serious disagreements among health
professionals (Yong et al., 2014). In particular, the researchers have sought
to examine whether the use of electronic cigarettes can reduce or eliminate the
use of conventional cigarettes among current smokers. In two randomized
controlled trials, electronic cigarettes were compared with non-nicotine
control therapy with the outcome being that both tests showed a low or very low
quality of evidence. Nevertheless, participants receiving electronic
cigarettes more than twice as often experienced a 6-month abstention from
cigarettes when compared with the participants in the control group. Another
cohort study comparing electronic cigarettes with a nicotine patch showed that
2 products contributed to similar 6-month abstinence rates from conventional
cigarettes. Other studies have shown that smoking electronic cigarettes is
associated with a significant reduction in the smoking of conventional
cigarettes. These data are useful for electronic cigarettes, but are limited
and far from final. A recent report from Public Health England (PHE) has
sparked controversy over electronic cigarettes, and the analysis of this
product visibly calls into question the origins and conclusions of the report;
showing the considerable controversy that is still involved concerning
electronic cigarettes (McNeil et al., 2016). This study, however, shows positive outcomes
when it comes to the use of electronic cigarettes as a cessation method, and it
is likely that they will be proven true.
Electronic
cigarettes, that are called electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) were
originally developed in China in 2003 and have since become wide on the market
throughout the world, particularly being oversubscribed on-line. ENDS is heated
and vaporized with an outcome containing nicotine, and which has lesser effects
than regular tobacco cigarettes (Kalkhoran and Glantz, 2016). Some proponents
of nicotine reduction from tobacco smoke indicate that these products are
considered viable substitutes for cigarettes, since they turn out fewer toxins
within the vapor delivered to the user. However, there certain issues regarding
unknown long term safety, inadequate data on content and emissions,
particularly with long use associated with nicotine that involve unsupported
claims to this product as an aid to quitting smoking. There may additionally be
causeless consequences related to the utilization of ENDS, together with the
power to cause nicotine dependence in non-smokers or to take care of dependence
in smokers. Additionally, some issues of concern were expressed that ENDS may
undermine the advanced restrictions on smoking within the premises and
therefore the policy relating to the absence of tobacco smoke. This study is so
pertinent as a result because it seeks to indicate that there are still several
unreciprocated queries regarding the utilization of electronic cigarettes as a cessation
tool once it involves encouraging people to quit smoking typical cigarettes. It
presents the hope that future studies will be able to finally determine,
without a doubt, that electronic cigarettes are the best means through which to
discourage cigarette use in the UK. It seeks to show that despite the
considerable issues and controversies involved in the use of electronic
cigarettes, it is still a viable option to replace regular cigarettes.
Samples
of current and former smokers interviewed within the four largest
English-speaking countries showed important awareness of electronic cigarettes:
from seventy three within the U.S. to twenty in Australia. Among those that
grasp, Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire tested electronic cigarettes
(7.6% of the full sample), and among those that tried electronic cigarettes,
39% (2.9% of the sample) were current users (Adkison et al., 2013). In numerous countries,
awareness of those relatively new products within the market was higher among
younger, non-minority teams with higher incomes. The testing and use of
electronic cigarettes were related to smoking standing and smoking frequency,
with smokers World Health Organization don't seem to be the foremost frequent
users on a commonplace, most frequently making an attempt to use electronic
cigarettes, though there have been few smokers within the sample. Current use
was related to an oversized reduction in cigarettes per day over time, compared
to non-electronic cigarette users, and this was proven among those participants
wherever knowledge was on the market. Despite this being the case, users are
not inclined to quit smoking than non-users. The latter finding can be
considered to have come about because quitting smoking can be an extremely
lengthy process that requires that the individual has time to handle the
various effects. The achievement of this goal can be furthered by the use of
electronic cigarettes because the latter ensures that the individual maintains
a level of nicotine consumption while at the same time helping these
individuals avoid the adverse effects of smoking.
The
comparatively higher prevalence of use of electronic cigarettes among
non-smokers might have many explanations (Wills et al., 2015). First, smokers do not take
cigarettes on a daily basis will supplement nicotine intake from alternative
sources, since smoking is restricted publicly places, and cigarettes are
getting costlier. As a lot of knowledge becomes available, it will be necessary
to assess whether or not the utilization of electronic cigarettes is related to
the addition of smokeless behavior policies because of smoking restrictions
reception, within the geographical point or in alternative public places. The
on the market knowledge for this sample failed to show a distinction within the
electronic cigarette take a look at between respondents did this compared to
those that failed to have a whole ban on smoking reception, though additional
use was a lot of doubtless among respondents within the U.S. failed to have
prohibitions on smoking reception. Secondly, the use of electronic cigarettes can
encourage smokers to reduce the overall smoking of cigarettes to a non-standard
pattern. The achievement of the goal of reducing smoking among smokers can
therefore be aided by the use of electronic cigarettes. This study shows that
individuals are more likely to reduce smoking, with the latter essentially
becoming less frequent. The possibility of ceasing to smoke is actually quite
high and it is possible that it might end up bringing about a situation where
electronic cigarettes become the norm.
To
date, one study has assessed electronic cigarettes as a means of reducing harm
and quitting smoking with encouraging results. However, a considerable
number of individuals that participated in the study reported that they used electronic
cigarettes as a method of obtaining nicotine in smokeless places (Hummel et al., 2015). This is an extremely significant observation
because it indicates that electronic cigarettes are also used to satisfy
nicotine dependence during periods of temporary abstinence. With the
addition of future waves of review of the International Tobacco Control, it
will be possible to track whether those who choose to use electronic cigarettes
independently from those who do not use electronic cigarettes are more or less
successful in their attempts to refrain from smoking. This study shows that one
of the most significant achievements of electronic cigarettes is that it has
led to a situation where individuals are more likely to quit smoking because
they have the means to obtain the nicotine that they need from time to time (Gravely et al., 2014). It is also a fundamental
study because it advances the idea that individuals are more than capable to
ensuring the advancement of means through which to bring their smoking under
control because they have an alternative to actually using conventional
cigarettes. Therefore, electronic cigarettes have become a method through which
to bring about an end to considerably higher harmful effects brought about by
conventional cigarettes.
Levels
of awareness, testing and use have been found to be surprisingly high in a
number of countries where electronic cigarettes are nominally illegal. This
situation is instrumental in showing that there is a diverse number of ways
through which individuals are able to obtain a ready supply of electronic
cigarettes (Adkison et al., 2013). Among the foremost necessary
information that can be found online, that is very necessary in promoting the
merchandise, especially, considering the convenience within which product may
be sold illegally and used privately. Indeed, those that responded with a
computer survey that will indicate a bigger use and familiarity with the web
sources a lot of doubtless to report data of electronic cigarettes. This
knowledge show however straightforward it is to limit product limitations
within the age of the web, and this could be necessary for regulators. Future
research should explore how electronic cigarette users get their devices;
determine the market share of various electronic cigarette products used, and
how products and marketing influence the patterns of use (Buonocore et al., 2017). Such a study will ensure
that there is a greater understanding of the status of electronic cigarettes in
society while at the same time enabling regulators to bring about a situation
where they are able to establish methods for the regulation and legalization of
the use of these devices.
Discussion
Assessing
the likely impact of cigarette smoking on public health, it is essential to
take into account the astonishing number of deaths and illnesses caused by
smoking all over the world. In this context, attempts should not be made to
prevent new promising approaches that can change this image. Like any new
approach that might presumably result in cessation of smoking, there ought to
be an overall analysis of electronic cigarettes on the idea of accessible data,
recognizing that an overall analysis of all potential long effects would
require a multiannual study. The data within the literature review shows that
electronic cigarettes will safely facilitate folks quit smoking. a substantial
range of studies have return to the conclusion that link the overwhelming majority
of smoking-related diseases to smoking product, rather than nicotine to tobacco
product and electronic cigarettes. Nicotine may be a substance that's extremely
addictive; however it is not the reason for cancer, respiratory organ sickness
or lung sickness seen in smokers. Though the rejection of all
nicotine-containing products is also a perfect target, smokers who try and stop
alone have less of an opportunity of long success and solely slightly a lot of
people that these have the chance to receive the mandatory health care. It is
therefore essential to make sure that there is the advancement of initiatives
aimed at bringing about a reduction of conventional cigarette smoking through
the use of electronic cigarettes. The latter can be used as a long-term
solution towards cessation because it will ensure that individuals cut down on
the number of cigarettes that they smoke.
In
this context, the possibility of switching from cigarettes to tobacco in
electronic cigarettes containing nicotine but not burning offers great
prospects as a way of saving lives. Researchers from authoritative
organizations, including the Tobacco and Alcohol Center in the United Kingdom,
and the Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine of the University of Geneva
have come to the conclusion that electronic cigarettes contribute to reducing
or eliminating tobacco use. Recently, the UK government in a bid to regulate
conventional cigarette smoking has approved electronic cigarettes as a cure for
this problem (Zhu et al., 2017). This position also supports common sense, since
any other form of nicotine replacement that has been studied so far has shown
that it helps people stop smoking; including studies conducted concerning nicotine
gum, nasal spray, inhalers and inhalers. In addition, compared to these
therapies, electronic cigarettes can more effectively satisfy the smoker's
desire with the rapid injection of nicotine as a cigarette and also satisfy the
usual aspects of smoking. As electronic cigarette technology improves, these
devices will certainly become more effective tools to help smokers break their
dependence on fuel cigarettes. It is possible that the use of these devices
will ensure that individuals are better able to gain control over their smoking
habit to such an extent that it brings about complete cessation. The
achievement of this objective through the use of electronic cigarettes has the
potential of making conventional cigarettes a thing of the past and will enable
society to significantly reduce the healthcare expenditure that involves
cigarette smoking.
The
available knowledge confirms by an awesome majority the study that electronic
cigarettes are fairly safe and by far very necessary; meaning that it is much
less dangerous than cigarettes. Despite the agreement of specialists, some
researchers have centered their attention on alternative health issues. Studies
involving the negative aspects of electronic cigarettes square measure of
dramatic quality and infrequently receive in depth coverage by the press. parenthetically,
some initial reports recommended that electronic cigarettes turn out methanol,
a venomous substance found in cigarette smoke (Ghosh and Drummond, 2017).
However, recent studies have shown that below traditional in operation
conditions, electronic cigarettes turn out abundant less methanol than tobacco
cigarettes. Moreover, the negative study mentioned shows that electronic
cigarettes might not be effective for smokers who need to prevent smoking. The
report received extensive but incorrect coverage in the press, as smokers who
go to electronic cigarettes may be an independent group with particular
difficulties to stop smoking. The gold standard for efficacy assessment is a
randomized clinical trial and two experiments so far have shown that electronic
cigarettes can help smokers stop smoking. One of the most fundamental issues
that are not addressed in this study is that there is little consideration that
most of the recommended remedies for cessation of smoking do not often work. Emergency
approaches are desperately required particularly considering that the WHO
predicts that one billion deaths are going to be related to smoking within the
twenty first century (Nemati et al., 2017). Electronic cigarettes have an
incomparable ability to scale back the result of smoking on smokers and
non-smokers by permitting smokers to exchange smoking habits and nicotine from
smoking while not becoming victims of the venomous effects of combustion.
Patients
use the electronic cigarette for a variety of reasons, but the most common are
many who stop smoking to reduce the number of cigarettes smoking per day and
use a product that is considered "healthier" than cigarettes smoking.
The use of electronic cigarettes is therefore a safer means of smokers
obtaining a dose of nicotine when compared to other forms of nicotine
administration. Thus, electronic cigarettes may have an advantage over other smoking
cessation treatment as it approaches optic and behavioral smoking. Many of the
aesthetic and behavioral aspects of smoking, which smokers are trying to stop
usually - for example, non-nicotine rewards and the aesthetic kinetic effects
of hand-mouth, visual or throat emotions are shaped using electronic cigarettes.
The use of these devices end up leading to the advancement of treatment for
smokers in such a way that they end up being discouraged from continuing to
make use of conventional cigarettes. It also ensures that there is a viable
option that can be adopted in a bid to achieve cessation because there are
instances where individuals are not willing to cease smoking immediately, and
the process has to be conducted at a slower pace. A consequence is that the use
of electronic cigarettes allows for the advancement of smoking cessation over a
long term; ensuring that there are lesser occurrences of individuals returning
to conventional cigarettes.
One
of the most important findings made by the studies above is that electronic
cigarettes could help smokers reduce the number of smoked cigarettes compared
to other methods of bringing about cessation. Although it is not known whether
"dual use" - using electronic cigarettes, and the continued smoking,
albeit less, cigarettes - is only one step in the process of smoking cessation
with the help of electronic cigarette or if it can prolong the duration of
smoking. It is well known that reducing the number of conventional cigarettes
is a useful strategy for smoking cessation and ultimately leads to less
exposure to harmful toxins than continued smoking. The studies in the
literature review have shown that reducing the number of smoked cigarettes
before the scheduled use of electronic cigarettes led to a reduction in
smoking, abrupt smoking, without reducing the number of smoked cigarettes. In a
small study in the UK, smokers who were given electronic cigarettes as part of
a specialized treatment to "stop smoking" and who failed in an
attempt to stop but continued to use electronic cigarettes to reduce the amount
of toxins, ended up being positively affected when compared to those who
continued smoking only smoke cigarettes, offering short-term "dual
use" associated with reducing damage. Therefore, the use of electronic
cigarettes can be considered an essential method, if not the most effective, in
helping smokers reduce smoking conventional cigarettes and eventual cessation.
Conclusion
Uncertainty
about hypothetical damage that might be caused by electronic cigarettes does
not always justify the imposition of sanctions. This is especially where the
costs and dangers of such a restriction are likely to be much higher than the
costs and to prejudice the "light touch" regulation based on what we
know about the toxicology of electronic cigarettes. Currently there are
data on the chemical properties of aerosols in the electronic cigarettes, so it
is difficult to think that the scope of any adverse health effects, even decades’
accumulation will rival what is derived from decades of toxic smoke
inhalation. Even if there were an adverse health effect unknown, the
authorities could probably wait several decades before there was any
sign. One of the most significant suggestions that can be made is that
those who offer to wait have an ethical obligation to specify what kind of
evidence would convince them to lift the sales ban in the electronic cigarettes. Appropriate
approach would be to enable product availability, while ensuring a stable
regulatory requirement for product ingredients and to use surveillance and
compliance at all levels of tobacco control and point of sale. In this way, it
will be possible to ensure that there are adequate controls aimed at reassuring
users as well as the public concerning the effectiveness of electronic
cigarettes in bringing about cessation of smoking.
Many
people will ask about electronic cigarettes, may have tried them, perhaps use
them on a daily basis, or intend to use them. They should be informed that
the electronic cigarettes are the safest options to continue to smoke tobacco
and are probably equally effective in quitting smoking, such as nicotine
replacement therapies. Those who do not want to quit smoking or who have
tried the range of evidence-based but non-smoking yet repeated approaches
should actively discontinue trying or continue using electronic cigarettes if
they are using them already. Rather than being discouraged, these individuals
should be supported and should be warned that if they use electronic
cigarettes, it is used more safely without further smoking, even a
cigarette. If they find it difficult to cut out smoking altogether, then
"dual use" should provide for a limited period of time, with the
intention of reducing and eventually ceasing to smoke cigarettes.
In
addition to the wide range of products within the electronic cigarette group,
several of the new inhaled nicotine devices that appear to be promising are in
development. These include products developed by tobacco companies such as
"unheated cigarettes", aerosol systems with metered dose inhaler and
a nicotine-pyruvate. Such products, especially those developed by the
tobacco industry and its subsidiaries, pose a challenge to community tobacco
control, although they have potential as new opportunities for many smokers
seeking help to quit smoking and improve their health. It also raises the issue
of reducing the harmful effects of smoking as a valid smoking strategy and
raises questions about industry commitment. As there is the development of
new products with reduced levels of harm, it is vital that healthcare professionals
adhere to the innovation and evidence in this area in order to guide people who
smoke in public and politicians to advance the use of electronic cigarettes.
Electronic
cigarettes are thought of by its critics as a cause for long harm. The chance
of harm from the long use of electronic cigarettes can't be rejected because of
the inhalation of ingredients other than nicotine, however most likely abundant
smaller and significantly below the results of smoking with acceptable product
standards. To minimize exposure to alternative elements ought to be attainable
to additional reduce physical health hazards. Though it is unimaginable to
accurately assess the long health risks related to electronic cigarettes,
studies indicate that it is unlikely to exceed five percent of those in regard
to smoking tobacco product and should be considerably less than that figure.
The studies and discussions above show the necessity for proportional
regulation, however recommended that regulation should not be able to considerably
impede the adoption and use of the electronic cigarettes which might end up
hurting smokers. The restrictive strategy ought to be a balanced approach to
making sure product safety, to change and encourage smokers to use the
merchandise rather than tobacco and to notice and stop the results that are
contrary to the objectives of the tobacco management policy.
References
ADKISON, S. E., O'CONNOR, R. J.,
BANSAL-TRAVERS, M., HYLAND, A., BORLAND, R., YONG, H.-H., CUMMINGS, K. M.,
MCNEILL, A., THRASHER, J. F. & HAMMOND, D. 2013. Electronic nicotine
delivery systems: international tobacco control four-country survey. American journal of preventive medicine,
44, 207-215.
ADRIAENS, K., VAN GUCHT, D.,
DECLERCK, P. & BAEYENS, F. 2014. Effectiveness of the electronic cigarette:
an eight-week Flemish study with six-month follow-up on smoking reduction,
craving and experienced benefits and complaints. International journal of environmental research and public health,
11, 11220-11248.
BROWN, J., BEARD, E., KOTZ, D.,
MICHIE, S. & WEST, R. 2014. Real‐world effectiveness of e‐cigarettes
when used to aid smoking cessation: a cross‐sectional population study. Addiction, 109, 1531-1540.
BUONOCORE, F., GOMES, A. C. M.,
NABHANI-GEBARA, S., BARTON, S. J. & CALABRESE, G. 2017. Labelling of
electronic cigarettes: regulations and current practice. Tobacco control, 26,
46-52.
CAMENGA, D. R., DELMERICO, J.,
KONG, G., CAVALLO, D., HYLAND, A., CUMMINGS, K. M. & KRISHNAN-SARIN, S.
2014. Trends in use of electronic nicotine delivery systems by adolescents. Addictive behaviors, 39, 338-340.
GHOSH, S. & DRUMMOND, M. B.
2017. Electronic cigarettes as smoking cessation tool: are we there? Current opinion in pulmonary medicine,
23, 111-116.
GRAVELY, S., FONG, G. T., DRIEZEN,
P., MCNALLY, M., THRASHER, J. F., THOMPSON, M. E., BOADO, M., BIANCO, E.,
BORLAND, R. & HAMMOND, D. 2014. The impact of the 2009/2010 enhancement of
cigarette health warning labels in Uruguay: longitudinal findings from the
International Tobacco Control (ITC) Uruguay Survey. Tobacco control,
tobaccocontrol-2014-051742.
HUMMEL, K., HOVING, C., NAGELHOUT,
G. E., DE VRIES, H., VAN DEN PUTTE, B., CANDEL, M. J., BORLAND, R. &
WILLEMSEN, M. C. 2015. Prevalence and reasons for use of electronic cigarettes
among smokers: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC)
Netherlands Survey. International Journal
of Drug Policy, 26, 601-608.
MALAS, M., VAN DER TEMPEL, J.,
SCHWARTZ, R., MINICHIELLO, A., LIGHTFOOT, C., NOORMOHAMED, A., ANDREWS, J.,
ZAWERTAILO, L. & FERRENCE, R. 2016. Electronic cigarettes for smoking
cessation: a systematic review. Nicotine
& Tobacco Research, 18,
1926-1936.
MCNEIL, A., BROSE, L., CALDER, R.,
HITCHMAN, S., HAJEK, P. & MCROBBIE, H. 2016. E-cigarettes: an evidence
update. A report commissioned by Public Health England. Available online a t:
www. gov. uk/government/publications/e-cigarettes-an-evidence-updat e (2015,
Last accessed 13th November 2015).
NEMATI, S., RAFEI, A., FREEDMAN, N.
D., FOTOUHI, A., ASGARY, F. & ZENDEHDEL, K. 2017. Cigarette and Water-Pipe
Use in Iran: Geographical Distribution and Time Trends among the Adult
Population; A Pooled Analysis of National STEPS Surveys, 2006-2009. Archives of Iranian Medicine (AIM), 20.
YONG, H.-H., BORLAND, R., BALMFORD,
J., MCNEILL, A., HITCHMAN, S., DRIEZEN, P., THOMPSON, M. E., FONG, G. T. &
CUMMINGS, K. M. 2014. Trends in e-cigarette awareness, trial, and use under the
different regulatory environments of Australia and the United Kingdom. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 17, 1203-1211.
ZHU, S.-H., ZHUANG, Y.-L., WONG,
S., CUMMINS, S. E. & TEDESCHI, G. J. 2017. E-cigarette use and associated
changes in population smoking cessation: evidence from US current population
surveys. bmj, 358, j3262.
